End to cash

It’s unavoidable: Cash will come to an end. The Bank of Norway want’s to phase it out and so want’s the US government. It’s cash which enables the black market and as governments worldwide intensify their fight against tax evasion, cash is an impediment to that fight.


Savings are bad

In many western countries interest rates are on an all-time low. As it seems technology can no longer sustain the rate of growth we got so accustomed with. Technology in hand with automation have brought us a service market devoid of people, or at exceptionally high prices. Personal wages are riddled by tax wedges which steeply increase labor costs and put  pressure on to replace human workforce by machines and self-service. If you hear self-service, personal responsibility, or entrepreneurship, be warned that others are in effect behind your money.

Continue reading “End to cash”

Let’s shift to 25 hours

TL;DR: If we increase the time span of day from 24 to 25 hours, we could solve a lot of the challenges of the future.

Our society is totally obsessed by efficiency. We improve existing services to become more efficient in what we are already doing or use new methodologies to conceive entirely new services which disruptively change what we are accustomed to do in the past.

It is obvious that performing a task in an inefficient manner is waste. If you order an item from your preferred online retailer, why would you wait for three days delivery if this time could be optimized to get your parcels in just one day? Why involving the postman at all if a drone could deliver parcels right into your backyard? Why retaining the job of the packer who puts your purchases past the cashier in bags if you can do it on your own? Why retain the cashier at all?


If a job according to metrics can be accomplished within 30 minutes, it seems illogical to finish that job in an hour timespan.

What does this urge for efficiency buys us? Machines replaced that many workers previously necessary to build a tunnel, household appliances taking over the chores of hour-long domestic work, and of course computers automatizing dreary bureau tasks. ICT is the productivity boost and to a large extend accounts for economic growth since the late 80is until now [1]. With that excess of free time gained through automation it should be save to assume mankind to be bored out. In fact, that’s what John Maynard Keynes believed to become his grandchildren’s reality: a three hours workday.

Sure, this Utopia never became true. Instead we see unemployment rise with the effect that in socialist Europe fewer have to take care for an ever increasing mass of people incapable to make a living of their jobs. It’s true that productivity gains led to an overall decline in working hours/year but at the price of people being forced to work part time, requiring more but one job to make a living, and fewer people feeding more who live in increasingly dire conditions.

Contrary to this obvious principle, there are “jobs” which are hard to accomplish in any shorter time, like the time spent with your children, partner, or parents. The composer takes it’s time to come up with truly moving lyrics and the painter to finish his Magnum Opus, unless they will also be replaced by AI. In fact there are not that many jobs in the future save from being replaced by a robot.

Today we are all racing against the machines.

The reason for that all? Productivity gains are being harvested by only a fraction of the society.

Swim with the tides.

Fighting against change is futile. So instead of dreaming of the better past it might make more sense to anticipate the future and be it just for the sake of knowing. Let us assume that striving for productivity will increase and with the help of ICT-supported robots, people will become unemployed in masses. Machines don’t pay taxes, so fewer people will earn more, but also will have to work more to support the unemployed [2]. Those with a job  will be the ones which are still “productive” and working in the few jobs, which cannot be taken over by machines. The fate of those humans in the workforce will be to remain productive, efficient.

In the past, efficiency has been increased by doing the same (or more) with less. One constant has not yet put into question and that is time, namely the notion of a day, 24 hours from dawn, midday, sunset, night to another day. Living in a 24 hour day is so naturally that, despite many differences how me measure speed, weight, volume, … in different parts of the world, nowadays every agrees that the day is divided into 24 hours, 60 minutes, 60 seconds.

It’s this notion of a 24 hour day which will hold back those who will still have to rely on people doing their job and not been replaced by machines.

So instead of a 24 hour day (“sunday”), let’s make it a 25 hour day, a “longday”.


No, the earth will still rotate in (roughly) 24 hours around it’s axis, but with an additional hour gained, people will be able to consume, let’s say, 16 hours of leisure while working for 9 hours. That’s right, one more hour productivity while leisure will stay the same! In mathematical terms, workforce efficacy will raise from 8/24 (~0.333) to 9/25 (0.36). This will of course lead to the fact that longdays will get out of sync with sundays. Assuming that your regular workday starts at 8 in the morning, after a couple of days, you will rise in the late afternoon and go to bed when the sun will rise!

Taking a look at this new working reality, many consequences arise:

  1. End of traffic jams. As people will opt-in this new work plan at different times, people will rush to work at different times. Even though the future will bring us autonomous vehiles, if we continue to stick to a 24 hour work day this would still mean that the vast majority of cars will be needed between 7 to 9 in the morning and between 5 and 7 in the evening. With 25 hour workdays, traffic jams will be a thing of the past with commuters evenly distributed over the day.
  2. End to the distinction between free time and work. The notion of free time will be a thing of the past. Nowadays a simple look at the sky (day, evening/night?) or the calender (weekend?) will give you a notion wheather it should be save to call your colleague or if you are likely to disturb. With longdays this distinction is gone.
  3. No more closing times. As the number of people at work with others in their official leisure time will be evenly distributed around the 24 hour time frame, no one must be penalized. That means shops and service must be available 24 hours round.
  4. End of time zones. Time zones are a thing which make sense when you are living according to a 24 hour rhythm and doesn’t make sense outside these constraints.

What other effects to expect from the 25 hour day? The 25 hour day – Dystopia or does this concept have chance to become reality? Should it become reality at all?

[1] B. Miller und R. D. Atkinson, „Raising European Productivity Growth Through ICT“. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Juni-2014.

[2] At least in socialist countries unless this principle will be decommissioned

Restore a Postgres Backup into a Docker container

At times, Docker can be mind-boggling, especially when you strive for doing things “right”, which means following the “everything is a container” approach.

Now and then you will have to get large amounts of data into your container like restoring a database backup into a Docker-container. The Internets are full with  good advice on how to do it (right), but given the combination of an out-of-docker database dump file and the intention to run a dockerized database with a data volume only container, the approach in this post was of help. I assembled the step-wise guide from the links in the footage, kudos goes to these authors.

Continue reading “Restore a Postgres Backup into a Docker container”

Docker on FIWARE

The previous post talked about the FIWARE project in general. This post will describe how to setup a virtual machine using Docker.

The FIWARE technical ecosystems (consisting eg. of the FIWARE Lab and Cloud) has little to offer on backend storage facilities. Thankfully, as being based on OpenStack, a developer should be fairly free to to set up anything up to the hearts content, as long as it fits into a virtual machine. Given that FIWARE supports Docker, I choose to go that route.

Continue reading “Docker on FIWARE”

(Open) Data sharing for free

I am currently involved in a project to assess and improve the quality of (meta-)data on open data portals. My fine colleagues at Vienna University of Economy showcased their current state of affairs on PortalWatch and presented some yet to disclose statistics on data quality of checked portals. That day I learned that Socrata powered open data portals store all their data in a proprietory data vault as opposed to CKAN, where internal storage is optional. Storing data within one system has it’s advantages like uniform access for  analysis. But in the long run it is not such a great idea.

Continue reading “(Open) Data sharing for free”

Getting go with FIWARE

FIWARE is a roughly 400 Million EURO EU-funded project to kick off an European cloud infrastructure and ecosystem. Wait, 400 Million Euros? That raised legit questions in me how my tax money is used, what is available and what not, what works and what is more shiny rather than useful.

I have a firm interest in Open Data and given my technical background, from time to time, I seek technical challenges. As Austria released their address data (including ZIP codes) as public sector information this kicked-off my challenge to import these data sets into a public cloud, to inspect them, and think about use cases. Continue reading “Getting go with FIWARE”